Not sure whether this painting is the right size, style, or color for your space? Read our guide to Choosing the Right Oil Painting for Your Home.
Le Dejeuner sur l'Herbe is a famous oil painting, completed in 1863. It is generally known by its English title, Luncheon on the Grass, although Edouard Manet initially titled his painting Le Bain, which translates to The Bath.
Le Déjeuner sur l’Herbe challenges 19th-century academic painting by placing a nude woman in a modern, non-mythological setting, confronting viewers with questions of morality, realism, and social convention in Paris.
Edouard Manet's Luncheon on the Grass depicts a female nude having lunch with two male companions. In the relatively dark scene, her body shines brightly, directly drawing the viewer’s attention to her gaze and physique. The two men appear deep in conversation, seemingly ignoring the nude woman. In front of the trio, a collection of objects is visible. These consist of items such as the woman’s discarded clothes, fruit, and bread depicted in the still life tradition.
Most intriguingly, however, another female appears in the scene. Located behind the group, a lightly dressed woman washes in a stream. The image is dreamlike, encouraging the viewer to question the reality of her presence. Furthermore, her large form overshadows the other figures, creating an impression that this ghostly figure floats above the scene.
While the brushwork in the foreground is precise, the background features loose brushstrokes, a deliberate artistic choice. The forest lacks creative depth, suggesting that the scene was not an accurate outdoor observation but rather a meticulously constructed studio set.
Furthermore, the use of studio lighting heightened the painting's surreal quality. The careful observer will note the almost complete lack of shadows. Supporting this interpretation, the man sitting on the right-hand side of the composition also wears a tasseled flat cap. During the 19th century, men only wore these hats indoors.
This man's likeness combines the likenesses of Manet’s two brothers: Eugène and Gustave Manet. The other man closely resembles his brother-in-law, Ferdinand Leenhoff. In this way, the work forms a rather unusual family portrait.
This analysis follows established art-historical research from museum collections, including the Musée d'Orsay and the Courtauld Gallery, as well as extensive scholarly commentary from the 19th-century critic Émile Zola.
There are many theories on why Manet depicted a fully nude woman in Luncheon on the Grass. Theories range from contrasting masculine and feminine qualities, a commentary on power dynamics, experience and innocence, light and dark, and even reinforcing the apparent social differences between the two clothed men and the naked woman.
In this latter interpretation, the woman’s presence could be seen as a critique of contemporary Parisian society. In a rapidly industrializing nation, the gap between the rich and the poor widened. This social and economic injustice worsened with the entrenched French class system and deep conservatism amongst the Parisian upper classes.
Whatever the reason for one of Manet's most famous nude paintings, we know the woman was Victorine Meurent, a favorite model of Manet's who he frequently painted throughout his career. Victorine also appears in another of Manet's famous nude paintings, Olympia, which is part of the Musée d'Orsay collection.
In both oil paintings on canvas, Victorine looks directly at the viewer. It is unclear whether she challenges, welcomes, or rebukes our gaze, or whether she invites us deeper into the scene to gaze beyond the pictorial space. In this way, the woman’s internal contemplation and her nudity become vital features of the painting and of its impact on the viewer.
We know little about Manet’s reasons for painting Luncheon on the Grass.
For instance, it is unknown exactly when Manet began work, only that it was sometime in 1862 or 1863. In addition, Manet left no preparatory sketches or notebooks discussing the painting.
However, this work held personal significance for the artist. At considerable personal cost, Edouard Manet chose a vast canvas measuring 82 x 104". At this time, large canvases were traditionally reserved for mythological or Religious art.
In addition to subverting compositional expectations, Manet also broke with the Classical Art tradition favored in France at the time. He did not blend his brushstrokes or carefully mix paints, and even contemporary observers note some areas of the painting appear unfinished.
Furthermore, Manet's painting creates the impression of a natural, life-like woman staring back at the viewer. The blemishes on her skin are visible, and her face possesses a true sense of personality and individuality. In comparison with the flawless, heavily stylized nude paintings by other famous French artists, such as Jean Auguste-Dominique Ingres and Alexandre Cabanel, Manet’s pioneering approach is straightforward.
Another interpretation of the work furthers Edouard Manet’s determination to remain faithful to reality. For example, it could depict prostitution, an activity rife at the Bois de Boulogne, a large park far from Manet’s home and studio. This prostitution, with many upper-class men forming the clientele, was well-known in Parisian society. Nonetheless, prostitution was too controversial a topic for direct painterly representation.
The representation of a nude woman sitting casually and enjoying lunch with two well-dressed men scandalized French society. Indeed, it remains an image capable of shocking even today. While some contemporaries, such as Émile Zola, argued in favor of the work, the French artistic establishment considered it too shocking for acceptance in the traditional Paris Salon Exhibitions.
Indeed, Manet initially submitted the work for display at the Salon of the Académie des Beaux-Arts. After its rejection, however, he opted for presentation at the Salon des Refusés. Here, the painting became a cause célèbre. Critics either warmly praised or scathingly condemned the painting.
Some claimed Edouard Manet’s brushwork appeared underdeveloped, whereas others claimed the painting lacked sincerity and its technique was “flabby.” While one critic described the nude woman as ugly, another criticized one of the men for not taking off his “horrible, padded hat.”
On the other hand, some critics praised the vivid depiction of a countryside scene and Manet’s expert use of color and energetic composition. Émile Zola described Le Dejeuner sur l'Herbe as the greatest painting by Edouard Manet. Zola claimed Manet realized the dream of all painters to represent figures with natural grandeur amid a landscape. He also criticized social hypocrisy by pointing out the plethora of celebrated classical artworks in the Louvre Gallery depicting nude women with clothed figures.
The actual location of Luncheon on the Grass remains a subject of hot debate. Most art historians argue that the landscape is l'Île Saint-Ouen, an idyllic spot just a short distance along the Seine River from Manet’s family home in Gennevilliers in the northwestern suburbs of Paris.
In terms of the painting’s physical location, Le Déjeuner sur l’Herbe stayed in Manet’s possession until 1878, when it was sold for 2,600 French Francs to Jean-Baptiste Faure, a celebrated French opera singer and art collector. The painting stayed in the ownership of Jean-Baptiste Faure for many years.
Le Déjeuner sur l'Herbe now resides at the Musée d'Orsay, accompanied by a smaller version (likely created by Manet as a study) at the Courtauld Gallery in London.
Our museum-quality oil painting reproductions of Édouard Manet’s Le Déjeuner sur l’Herbe are individually hand-painted on canvas by professional artists using traditional techniques. Each reproduction is created to order, ensuring faithful color harmony, scale, and brushwork. Our replica oil paintings are never printed, automated, or mass-produced, offering a refined and lasting way to bring Manet’s masterpiece into your home.
Explore our curated collection of Impressionist oil paintings, faithfully hand-painted using premium materials for lasting beauty, authenticity, and display quality
Shop Now to find your perfect piece of art history.
All our hand-painted oil painting reproductions are backed by a 45-day, 100% refund or replacement guarantee, so you can order with complete confidence.
We ship free to anywhere in the world via FedEx or DHL expedited service with online tracking.
Your painting will be shipped rolled in strong plastic tubing, ready for stretching and/or framing locally. This is the conventional method of transporting hand-painted oil on canvas. Learn more about how your painting is shipped.
We are able to offer a framing service intercontinental U.S. Please contact us if you would like a quotation. Alternatively, should you prefer, we can recommend a framer in your area.
Your painting will be shipped directly from our Studio in Thailand.
After helping customers choose hand-painted oil paintings for many years, one pattern appears repeatedly. Most people have little difficulty identifying the paintings they are drawn to. The greater challenge is deciding which size will work best, how the artwork will relate to the room, and whether it will remain enjoyable to live with over time.
A painting can completely alter the atmosphere of a room. Sometimes a space that feels unfinished suddenly becomes balanced once the right artwork is installed. Other times, beautifully furnished interiors never feel entirely comfortable because the painting is too small, too visually demanding, or disconnected from the surrounding architecture.
Over the years, we have found that the paintings people continue to enjoy are rarely chosen solely because they match the furniture. Scale, wall proportions, natural light, ceiling height, viewing distance, and personal connection all influence whether artwork feels naturally integrated into a home.
The most successful interiors usually feel personal rather than overly planned. Paintings often work best when they are chosen because they suit the room, reflect the owner's taste, and remain enjoyable to live with over time.
One of the most common mistakes people make when choosing artwork is being too cautious with scale.
A painting can look surprisingly substantial on a computer screen or even inside a gallery, then feel much smaller once it is placed above a large sofa or on a wide, uninterrupted wall.
Many homeowners are surprised by how much visual space a room absorbs once furniture, lighting, and viewing distance are taken into account.
Rooms with higher ceilings often require larger paintings than people initially expect. A painting that feels substantial in a standard-height room can sometimes appear visually disconnected when placed on a tall wall with significant empty space above and below it. This is one reason artwork selected for apartments, lofts, and contemporary homes with higher ceilings is often larger than customers originally planned.
Open-plan interiors are particularly challenging because paintings are often viewed from several feet away rather than up close. A size that feels generous when viewed online can sometimes feel lost once installed within a larger living space.
Paintings in open-plan interiors are frequently viewed from much greater distances than people realize. A painting above a sofa may also be visible from the dining area, kitchen, hallway, or staircase. For this reason, artwork that appears generously sized when viewed up close can sometimes feel surprisingly small in the finished room.
For this reason, many people find that they would have been happier choosing a larger size. That does not mean every room requires oversized artwork, nor does it mean a collection of smaller paintings cannot work beautifully. However, when a painting is intended to act as a focal point, slightly larger dimensions are often more successful than most people initially expect.
This is something people often do without realizing it, particularly in homes with higher ceilings.
A useful way to assess placement is to spend time in the room and view the painting from the positions where it will most often be seen. In living rooms, this may be from a sofa, while in hallways, dining rooms, and entrance halls, it is more likely to be from a standing position.
Rather than focusing on a specific measurement, consider whether the painting feels naturally connected to the surrounding furniture and architecture. If viewers find themselves looking noticeably upward to appreciate the artwork, the painting may be hanging higher than necessary. In most interiors, artwork feels most comfortable when it can be viewed easily and naturally without drawing attention to its placement on the wall.
Natural light changes paintings throughout the day. This is something many people only notice after the artwork arrives and is hanging on the wall.
A painting that looks bright and vibrant in a sunlit room during the morning can feel quite different in the evening under artificial lighting. Wall colors, flooring, ceiling height, window placement, and even the direction a room faces all influence how colors and details are perceived.
Oil paintings are particularly sensitive to changing light because textured brushwork and layered paint surfaces reflect light unevenly across the canvas. This gives oil paintings much of their character, but it also means they rarely look the same from one time of day to another.
Paintings with softer palettes and atmospheric brushwork often adapt naturally to these changing conditions. This is one reason Impressionist paintings remain consistently popular in residential interiors. By contrast, paintings with very dark backgrounds or dramatic shadows can sometimes feel considerably heavier in person than they appear in a photograph, particularly in rooms that receive limited natural light.
For this reason, it is often helpful to think about when a room is used most frequently. A painting viewed primarily during daylight hours may create a very different impression from the same painting viewed mainly in the evening.
Not every painting makes its strongest impression immediately.
Some artworks attract attention within seconds because of a dramatic subject, bold color, or familiar image. Others are quieter. Their appeal often develops gradually as the viewer begins to notice smaller details, relationships within the composition, or aspects of the painting that were not obvious at first glance.
This is something many people discover only after a painting has been hanging in their home for some time. An artwork that initially seemed straightforward may continue to reveal interesting details, while a painting chosen purely for its immediate impact can sometimes become less interesting once the novelty has worn off.
When viewing paintings online, there is a natural tendency to make decisions quickly. However, it is often worth spending a little longer with the artworks that repeatedly draw your attention. The paintings that reward a second or third look frequently possess a depth that is difficult to appreciate from a brief first impression alone.
This does not necessarily depend on the age, style, or monetary value of a painting. What matters is whether the artwork continues to hold interest over time. In our experience, paintings that invite repeated viewing often become some of the most satisfying works to own because they remain engaging long after the initial purchase decision has been forgotten.
When choosing artwork, many people focus primarily on furniture, wall colors, and decorative accessories. Yet the architecture of a room often has an equally important influence on how a painting is perceived.
For example, a large contemporary room with clean lines and open walls can comfortably support paintings that might feel overwhelming in a smaller, more traditional setting. Equally, a classical interior with decorative moldings, timber furnishings, and period features can often accommodate paintings with greater visual complexity than a minimalist space.
When choosing artwork, it is often helpful to think about the room as a whole rather than focusing on individual furnishings. Paintings tend to feel most successful when they relate naturally to the scale and character of the space in which they will be displayed.
Successful interiors do not necessarily depend on exact color matching. Artwork often works best when it complements a room without feeling obliged to repeat every color already present within the furnishings.
One of the biggest challenges when choosing artwork online is imagining how the painting will actually look once it is installed. A painting that appears substantial on a computer screen can feel surprisingly small on a large wall, while an oversized painting can sometimes look far more balanced in a room than expected.
For this reason, many customers find it helpful to look beyond the product image and consider how the artwork will relate to the space in which it will be displayed. Ceiling height, furniture placement, wall proportions, natural light, and viewing distance all influence how a painting feels within a room.
A simple technique used by many interior designers is to cut a piece of craft paper, newspaper, or cardboard to the exact size of the painting being considered and temporarily attach it to the wall using removable adhesive such as Blu Tack. This provides an immediate sense of scale and often helps people decide whether they would be happier with a larger or smaller size before placing an order.
Customer installation photographs can also be helpful because they show paintings displayed in real homes rather than in isolation. Seeing completed paintings within finished interiors often provides a clearer understanding of proportion, placement, and how different styles of artwork interact with a living space.
After viewing customer installation photographs, many people discover that paintings they initially considered oversized often look remarkably balanced once installed. Seeing artwork displayed in real homes frequently provides a clearer understanding of scale, wall proportions, and visual impact than dimensions alone can.
For customers who would like additional assistance, our team is also happy to review photographs of a room and discuss possible painting sizes, subjects, or placement options. In many cases, a second opinion can help narrow the choice between several paintings or confirm whether a particular size is likely to work well within the space.

One of the most common surprises when viewing customer installations is how comfortably larger paintings can sit within relatively small rooms. This dining area demonstrates how a well-proportioned painting can create a strong focal point without overwhelming the surrounding space.

This customer photograph illustrates how the right proportions are sometimes more important than size alone when selecting paintings for a room.

Customer installation photograph showing the relationship between artwork, wall space, furniture, and room proportions within a finished interior.
Ultimately, there is no formula that guarantees the perfect painting. Size, placement, lighting, and room proportions all matter, but they are only part of the decision. The paintings that people treasure most are often the ones that immediately capture their attention, spark their imagination, or feel right from the beginning. If a painting speaks to you, continue returning to it, and if you can genuinely imagine living with it for many years, it is often worth trusting that instinct. A well-chosen painting is more than decoration; it becomes part of the home and can provide enjoyment, interest, and inspiration for years to come.
All of our paintings come with a 7.5cm (just under 3") clean surplus canvas so the framer can achieve good leverage and easy stretching.